What's new
Mastiff Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Welcome back!

    We decided to spruce things up and fix some things under the hood. If you notice any issues, feel free to contact us as we're sure there are a few things here or there that we might have missed in our upgrade.

When Did Balance Become a Dirty Word by Karma Performance

Duetsche_Doggen

Well-Known Member
Despite my situation. Mary I just wanted to say funny you posted this. I'm going through the same ordeal with Stone right now. Because of Stone's anxiety she recommended private classes with were $100 more than the "traditional" and of course no prongs or "abusive" methods of training.........we tried the "purely positive" clicking and treating to get Stone to "focus" on a handler, but that was pointless.

I contacted another trainer who did a home invasion with Thor. His views are pretty much my own and he's not a big fan of "purely positive" training. I brought Stone's prong to the assessment orientation. The guy couldn't find a thing wrong with Stone, he says he has anxiety but its very workable, he just needs the discipline, once he has that he'll be fine. As my thread of "Stoned" illustrated he was right.

The first time I gave Stone a correction in the store with the prong in the eyes of the "purely positive" I was told that "Its not allowed in the store" yet they sell prongs.....crappy ones I might add. Now that the "purely positive" trainer has seen the change in Stone she's become a bit more "open" but she still doesn't like them.

I'm a pretty open person I like to learn new things with my dogs and I have learned some interesting methods of training the boys using some "purely positive" methods, however IMO none of the easy walk harness, gentle leads, halties, can hold a candle to a good old fashion correction.
 

Smokeycat

Well-Known Member
I can't see how anyone could use a positive only training technique and expect a dog to somehow learn what not to do. It makes no sense. Although it might explain some of the dogs that have been in training classes with either dog. I have always used a positive based approach but they do have consequences for bad behavior, especially if they 'know' better.
 

Sadies Mom

Well-Known Member
Great read!!!!! I have questioned my self many times if I am doing things right. I have used a prong as a training tool and it has been a life saver. I have not eliminated the prong, but it is used sparingly. My goal is to eliminate it 100%, but we are not there yet. My ultimate goal with Sadie was to have a dog that behaves in public and a dog that is happy with her life. With using the balanced training method, I feel I have accomplished most of it. With all the challenges I have had with Sadie, I am very happy with our progress. I have popped the collar, tapped her on the head (I still do that sometimes), time outs, you name it I have tried it. Again, great read
 

ruthcatrin

Well-Known Member
Oh, and for anyone else who has to deal with these folks on a regular basis, apparently now NILF is EVIL too, cause it doesn't coddle the dog and doesn't allow them to get away with shit.....
 

Iymala

Well-Known Member
I have noticed that too Ruth. It blows my mind that they somehow deamonized NILF. The only day of my life that is not NILF is my birthday and while my dogs are spoiled (lots of toys, treats and the cance to spend as much of the day inside or outside playing as they like, they are allowed on the furniture and in the bed with us), they are also asked for certain behaviors before they get their treats or food. If they want some loves they are asked to sit politely. I dont do full fledged NILF but parts of it.
 

ruthcatrin

Well-Known Member
I can't argue that NILF can be taken to far. But thats true with ANY training technique or process. And requiring a dog to be polite in order to get attention or a treat or play is NOT to much to ask. *pounds head into wall*
 

kbuchanan66

Well-Known Member
I think not using Nilif at least some of the time creates chaos. My boys don't get any treat or even supper with out doing something for me. Even to throw a ball they need to sit calmly until being released.
 

Iymala

Well-Known Member
NILF really teaches the dog self control and consistent expectations. I have seen dogs without any self control and that is a scary and often annoing experience. Heck, my puppies are still super young and anytime I go to the fridge (where their treats are also kept as I normally just use cut up meat) they are 2 steps behind me sitting potlitely looking at me. If they dont get a treat they are still happy and just go lay down and if they do I change it up from just giving them the treat for acting appropriately or asking them for a different command.
 

Iymala

Well-Known Member
..but who knows.... maybe I am killing my dogs individuality and not allowing them to express themselves like little shits just because I want a well behaved dog. I should talk to my mother about squashing my individuality and uniqueness for teaching me manners and how to behave in polite company....that evil wench.
 

ruthcatrin

Well-Known Member
I think not using Nilif at least some of the time creates chaos. My boys don't get any treat or even supper with out doing something for me. Even to throw a ball they need to sit calmly until being released.

NILF really teaches the dog self control and consistent expectations. I have seen dogs without any self control and that is a scary and often annoing experience. Heck, my puppies are still super young and anytime I go to the fridge (where their treats are also kept as I normally just use cut up meat) they are 2 steps behind me sitting potlitely looking at me. If they dont get a treat they are still happy and just go lay down and if they do I change it up from just giving them the treat for acting appropriately or asking them for a different command.

Exactly. But suggest it to someone with a mis-behaving dog and get jumped on. I just got told that expecting a dog to cope with NILF is too stressfull for the dog in question. Um hullo! This isn't a feral or abused dog who needs to be coaxed out of his shell. This is a dog who's reacting to a major change in his life by reverting to extremely bad behavior, up to an including knocking over the toddler to steal food!
 

Iymala

Well-Known Member
Maybe I am off kilter, but I think NILF would reduce stress. It sets clear and consistent expectations and schedules. The dog knows what is expected of it and that good things will happen if follows the routine. It takes the guesswork out of the equation if the dog is trying to figure out on its own how to cope with a new situation or family. The dog now knows for instance.... if I want attention... I need to go sit in front of said person and they will pet me. If I go jump on them they will ignore me. It takes time and conditioning, but everyone is more stable and safe in the long run.
 

ruthcatrin

Well-Known Member
Thats what I keep trying to say, and to be fair I'm not the only one, but OMG does it feel like I'm talking to a wall....
 

kbuchanan66

Well-Known Member
They are saying how dogs need a schedule and purpose to be happy but yet we are not going to force them to do anything. Well I think you kind of have to for the mental stability of the dog and a persons SANITY. I could not imagine having a 100lb dog jumping on me all the time and running away and I couldn't imagine endangering others safety because I am unsure how my dog is going to react
 

2nd Chance

Well-Known Member
I love the noun cult for PO trainers. Hilarious.
And lovely article.
Im well up for correcting my dogs, never had a problem with it, and neither do they. Once i am 100% convinced that they understand the command perfectly, and have chosen not to obey. I'll correct. 100% of the time.
Which is extreemly rare here. Corrections for my dogs are severe from their perspective, yet all i have done is used 'that' tone, or moved them into the correct position manually. That's seriously in the shite here.

For our screwed up DDB rescue abuse survivor, i use B.A.T. which is positive only method.
I am a grandparent, i notice the PO training of kids method has been such a success, NOT.
I never bothered with it for my kids, so why for my dogs?
 

BlackShadowCaneCorso

Super Moderator
Staff member
LOL! Our kids are PO trained either so I am likely considered a bad pet owner as well as a bad parent :) Fine by me but my kids know their manners when out and to respect others (both furry and skin kids)
 

MissJ

Well-Known Member
I agree with the article one hundred percent. I know a well meaning PO zealot and have had to stop her feed on FB, she is misguided at best. They are not doing the dogs any favours as most, particularly big powerful dogs with strong personalities, like ours, do need strong leadership, and to know their are consequences to their wrong actions.

My five and a half month old Boerboel George is highly food motivated and I do use food along with heavy praise to reward prompt returns on walks and to teach to sit, lie down etc...but have to agree that when you are irradicating negative behaviours, mouthing, biting, growling, challenging and disobedience,(once you know they understand what is wanted and not wanted,) to let these behaviours go uncorrected is asking for trouble, and could lead to a dangerous and uncontrollable dog, and a dead dog if it were to cause an accident or have to be put down.
It also really annoys me when I see the witch hunt that has been orcestrated on Ceasar Millan. He strikes me as a basically kind man, who has turned around lots of aggressive dogs that would have been destroyed if it wasn't for him. There are ridiculous clips of him on You Tube where someone has edited his shows so that he is made to appear someone he isn't. He is only a little man and sometimes he has had to wrestle his way out of dangerous situations and it can look a bit messy! lol
These smug PO enthusiasts can be so insulting and condescending, and assume anything else is cruel.
Each dog is of course different and a stern look is enough for some dogs, but just because something has worked for your dog, it is wrong to assume when someone else tries the same thing and it doesn't work for them, the owner is doing it wrong. Bringing up a pup is an ongoing journey of learning and adapting, very much like being a parent. The PO trend is going to result in a lot more dangerous dogs out there. There are a lot of dogs being re homed because they have been been brought up with the PO method and it has been unsuccessful, and then the new owners then also pussy foots around as they are assuming the dog has been mistreated and that is why it is there. I truly believe that a dog, like a child appreciates the security of strong leadership and the vast majority of dog owners are not sadists and will use the gentlest form of training their dog will respond to.
Sorry about my little rant! lol
 

Catia

Well-Known Member
I admit I did not read every word, but I have to agree on most everything when it comes to real world life.

It would be a wonderful world if everything could be gained through *positive only*--a Utopia of sorts.
Fact is, every single being would have to be on the same exact page & thought process, & that's just not going to happen in this life. But then again, I live in the real world & don't have the luxury of sheltering myself in a bubble.

I've worked with pooches, & also I've worked with children who are special needs, & also worked with kids who have serious behavioral issues.
I have also raised a child with serious behavioral issues for 15 of the 20 yrs of their life. I have both seen & experienced both sides.

Positive only people, the one's who are inflexible to any other concept, IMHO have issues of their own.
They should be dealing with those issues--within their own psyche.
These types who are PO only & your pooch is abused if you use any other method-- appear terrified of consequences--any consequences--they don't teach them to their kids, their dog or anything else--it's as if they want to ignore the fact that consequences exist.
This is where the UNREALITY comes in. ignoring the fact that consequences exist, & refusing to teach consequences *does* lead to seeking behaviors.--Whether it is animals or humans--consequences teach limits & boundaries.
Every animal seeks to understand their limits & boundaries. Be it a fish, a dog or a3 or a 15 year old child.

For instance, it has been my direct experience that 're-direction only' fails at some point, be it dog or child, at some point, you've got to make it clear a certain behavior is not acceptable. Re-direction helps, & should be the 1st step--because it gives the outlet & shows what is an acceptable behavior--but when the old behavior is resorted to, something needs to be done to deter- the behavior you want to stop-not just distracting away from it.

Both human beings & other animals evolve & there is (was) survival of the fittest throughout evolution.
This certaily was NOT positive only.

if all you ever get is a distraction or a redirection, it then becomes limitless, no clear boundaries exist.
Just like good fences can make good neighbors, boundaries are necessary, & so is the understanding of what can or will happen if the boundary is crossed.

LOL I've gotten to a point with the PO people with kids, where I just view it as raising poorly adjusted, ill prepared pre-adults--they can't handle stress or pressure, all they've ever known was a bubble of positive. They crumble in workplaces because competition isn't fair & neither is life & they seem clueless as to understand why they don't keep getting more chances when they skrew up. And this is humans-with the capability of deep understanding. These kids do not understand their place, how to cope, or how to move past, suck it up, pick themselves up & move on in the real world.

As far as PO people with dogs, I tune it out now. balance is key & is realistic. I don't live in a bubble & neither does my pooch. A Pooch's mother taught by using corrections, & the pup clearly understood. This is how they communicate.
Then a human comes in & just distracts/redirects...no rules are defined.

The adrenalized seeking behaviors are pretty much on spot, & the description is simplified, but it hits the gist of things.
The HPA Axis is a complicated *negative feedback* loop system.
The hypothalmus(CRH/CRF) stimulates the pituitary(ACTH) that stimulates the adrenals(adrenaline{epinephrine} & cortisol), with the adrenals eventually signalling the hypothalmus via cortisol to stop producing CRF.

The more stimulus an animals brain has when it is a baby & in the development stages, the more pathways are built.
The more stimulus an animals brain has when young also directly correlates to the ability to handle stress later in life, through various stimulations of the HPA axis. Once pathways are built, they are there for life. If they are never built, you may miss a window that cannot be opened. For humans, one great example is language, if this window is missed, impairment for life can result (this was found through studies of abused/neglaected children), this is probably the most extreme example.

Keep in mind, PO for dogs (or humans) is a form of behavioral psychology, it's not science in the sense of law, it is theory.
It is very similar to BMT (behavioral modification therapy), with the exception that it uses no negative reinforcements or corrections.
Many theories work perfectly in text books & limited situations.
PO doesn't have a bunch of neuro-endocrinological scientific tests to back up the data for dogs/dolphins or rats.
The cost to do this with MRI/SPECT scans & a ton of expensive bloodwork is still in it's infancy with people.
There is some info from the BMT side, with humans (& some animals).
Much of the research comes from veterans, holocaust victims, POWs & traumatized children & some lab animals, usually wistar rats, & some monkeys. Every once in a while there may be some studies on dolphins or dogs--but it's expensive & very very limited funding.

Most of the people who are going off about PO only do not have a backround in neuro-endocrinological studies, or even a clear understanding of how the hypothalmus works with the hpa axis. Best understanding they might have is Pavlov's dog type of stuff. They're not scientists, & they are grabbing research from other areanas & it doesn't always apply in reality.
 

Duetsche_Doggen

Well-Known Member
The trainer told me she asked a forum that was mostly PO I'm assuming...... if prongs could be like "security blanket" given Stone's improvement from them. Given the flaming responses she said she got, there's her answer, haha!