What's new
Mastiff Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Welcome back!

    We decided to spruce things up and fix some things under the hood. If you notice any issues, feel free to contact us as we're sure there are a few things here or there that we might have missed in our upgrade.

Fawn vs Brindal

Ripley

Member
this may be a silly question, but are fawns generally bigger bodied EMs? Just seems like all the pictures i see of the "really" big dogs are all fawn, few black. Or is it just they are more common, wanted?
 

Ripsmom

Well-Known Member
Re: Fawn vs Brendel

I've seen really bulky dogs in both brindles and fawns...I think it has more to do with the line...but i really don't know...I know that I have heard that even with the danes the harlequins seem to be bigger boned. question: is your dog's name Ripley?
 

ModernMolosser

New Member
This is an interesting question, because many Mastiff (and Bullmastiff) breeder-judges point out that the brindling creates an optical illusion regarding the substance of a dog. As any woman knows, one wears black to look slim :) So brindle dogs may look thinner than fawns and reds for this reason.

Fawns tend to be preferred in the show ring for a variety of reasons: Expression is harder to see on a black face ... the brindling enhances movement flaws, especially rolling ... and brindling can create an optical illusion with the angulation of a dog, making a shoulder, for example, seem straighter than it actually is.

Interestingly, there does not appear to be this brindle bias in Cane Corsos, perhaps because dark dogs in that breed are desirable ... see the current trend toward black Corsos in Europe. And because of their coloration, they too can appear more athletic and slim than their fawn and formentino cousins.

Denise
Publisher
Modern Molosser