What's new
Mastiff Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Welcome back!

    We decided to spruce things up and fix some things under the hood. If you notice any issues, feel free to contact us as we're sure there are a few things here or there that we might have missed in our upgrade.

Canada-End of BSL in Nackawic?

Vicki

Administrator
A doggone solution in Nackawic?

Published Friday August 7th, 2009
By Shawn Merrithew

Nackawic is one step closer to putting the leash on its controversial dog bylaw.

At Tuesday evening’s regular meeting, town council unveiled its proposed amendments with the first and second readings of its new dog bylaw, which would see “the vicious dog†classification given to canines based their actions and not by their breed.
Under the current bylaw, vicious and restricted dogs are deemed so by breed. Pit bull terriers, Rottweilers and mixed breeds of either are considered vicious and are subject to a $250 fee to keep them within town limits.

Many concerned residents have called the town’s current bylaw discriminatory to dogs and responsible dog owners, prompting council to review it and make some changes.

The issue all came to a head earlier this spring when Dr. Mary Ann Bramstrup went to town office to have her Rottweiler-mix companion Jessie registered.

Instead of paying $15 to have her dog licensed, which she had been paying previously for three years, Bramstrup said she was informed her four-legged friend was classified as a restricted breed, and she would have to pay $250 to keep her beloved pet in Nackawic.

Bramstrup said she was shocked and outraged.
“It’s racial profiling for dogs,†Bramstrup said. “I think it is a bad bylaw to have because it doesn’t address the real problem, which is dogs running loose (around town) and biting people.â€

Acting chief administration officer Kathryn Clark said the bylaw had been in place for a while, but it was only recently enforced earlier this year after an incident involving a pit bull terrier in the town.

“From our dog catcher’s standpoint, he said ‘I will enforce it if the council will also enforce it,’†Clark explained earlier this spring. “So if we are going to enforce it for one, we have to enforce it for everyone.â€

But throughout the spring and summer, council was continually bombarded by concerned residents who have voiced their opinion on the hot issue.

Many felt the town’s bylaw was unfair to responsible dog owners like Bramstrup, and residents like Murray McEwen and Don and Pat Degagne stepped forward in her defence.

Don Degagne said he couldn’t understand why the town would force a dog owner of certain breeds to pay a fine of $250 for owning a “vicious dog.â€

Any dog can be vicious regardless of the breed, he pointed out, and it is not the dog fault for being aggressive but the people who raise it.

“They are not born this way,†Don said. “People train them that way. This bylaw is wrong, and it discriminates against good people and responsible dog owners.â€

They asked council to review the dog bylaw and come up with a fair solution to address the issue.

On Tuesday evening, residents’ concerns were addressed.
Under the proposed amendments, “a vicious dog†would be one which has a tendency to attack, has bitten, chases, without provocation, humans or other domestic animals or has a continuing threat to harm humans or other domestic animals.

Mayor Rowena Simpson said the revisions are the results of three extensive and long meetings council conducted over the issue. While council has moved ahead with the first and second reading of the proposed bylaw, she said it is still not set in stone.
Coun. Brian Grant said there has been a lot of research put into the new bylaw changes, but he still has gotten concerns from residents who feel the bylaw should stay as it is.

Coun. Paul Legere added he has received similar concerns.
“I have had some who want change, and others who don’t,†Legere said.

“They feel if we take it (the current bylaw) away, we will have other issues.â€

Coun. Peter Seymour pointed out other municipalities are veering away from the certain breed classification in their dog bylaws and are focusing more on dogs who bite on a regular basis. The proposed amendments for Nackawic’s bylaw are following suit, he added.

Since residents’ feelings are all over on the topic, Mayor Simpson said the dog bylaw will not be finalized until the public has had its say.

“This is not any easy thing to do,†Simpson said. “It is something we need public input on, so we should have a public meeting on it.â€
Once the public meeting is held, residents’ thoughts and opinions on the matter will be taken into consideration, Simpson said, and, hopefully, the town can put its dog days of summer to rest.

bugleobserver.com - A doggone solution in Nackawic? | By Shawn Merrithew - Breaking News, New Brunswick, Canada
 

Vicki

Administrator
Dog owners take bite out of Nackawic bylaw

Published Wednesday August 19th, 2009

Upset | Public meeting to discuss changes

By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN

llewellyn.stephen@dailygleaner.com

NACKAWIC – About 30 people turned out to a public meeting Tuesday night to debate a proposed new dog control bylaw.

The new bylaw, which passed first and second reading two weeks ago, will eliminate references to pit bull terriers, Rottweilers and any dog with a mix of those breeds.

Those breeds or mixed breeds are restricted in Nackawic and cost $250 to licence in the current dog control bylaw.

The restrictions include keeping such breeds leashed at all times and muzzled when in public.

The bylaw became controversial last spring when the town began enforcing it after a dispute between two neighbours involving one of the restricted breeds.

Nackawic physician Dr. Mary Ann Bramstrup wasn’t one of the people involved in the dispute.

But she owns a Rottweiler mix named Jessie.

“I now have to drive outside the town limits to walk my dog,†Bramstrup told the meeting at town hall.

She said her dog can’t wear a muzzle because it can’t pant properly in the hot weather.

“I can’t let her off the leash even on my own property,†said Bramstrup.

She also had to pay $250 for her dog licence instead of the regular fee of $25.

Bramstrup was so upset by the situation that last month she announced she was withholding extra medical services from the town, such as participating in mock disasters.

The media attention prompted town council to draft a new bylaw.

It doesn’t mention restrictions on specific breeds.

But it keeps restrictions on a dog deemed to be vicious, which is defined as an animal with a tendency to attack without provocation, an animal that has bitten a human or another animal without provocation, a dog that chases humans or animals or is a continuing threat to cause serious harm.

The licence for a vicious dog would still be $250.

Many in the audience were worried that the definition of a vicious dog was too vague and questioned who would declare an animal to be vicious.

Others were worried that an animal could be declared vicious, seized and put to sleep by the town.

People asked why a dog would be allowed in the town at all after it was declared vicious.

Deputy Mayor Jacques Laroche chaired the meeting and said only a court could decide if an animal was vicious and needed to be destroyed.

He also said the need for the $250 licensing fee would be reviewed.

Bramstrup said the proposed bylaw is a big improvement on the old one.

“It will allow me to be treated the same as anyone else who has a dog that hasn’t done anything wrong,†she said.

But the controversial bylaw still remains in effect and that means Bramstrup can’t walk her dog off her property without it being muzzled.

[irrelevant text elided] …

More than one person said that a bylaw is worthless if it can’t be enforced.

But Coun. Peter Seymour said enforcement is expensive.

In one case, he said, a municipality spent $3,000 in court costs to collect dog tag fees worth less than $100.

[irrelevant text elided] …

Simpson said council is trying to find the right balance between the rights of dog owners and public safety.

“What is going to happen next is we will go back to our bylaw review committee and as quickly as we can, try to make some changes,†Simpson told The Daily Gleaner after the meeting.

She said she expected the revised bylaw to come up for third and final reading at council’s next regular meeting Sept. 8.

http://dailygleaner.canadaeast.com/front/article/765161