ruthcatrin
Well-Known Member
There are 2 of us that agree Ruth
lol, thanks Cody.
There are 2 of us that agree Ruth
I wouldnt allow the dog on the furniture, ive never seen a pup growl in pain...a yelp and bite yea, but a growl and snap seems unusual. If it was my pup id continue training., and not allow him on the furniture at least until he learna where he stands At this point he probably seea your son as a littermate, and of xourse weve already discussed children should not be picking up puppies
To me the 'solution' seems to be two pronged. 1) Teach the child limits with the puppy and from another post it does seem that he has at least started to see why the rules are there. Great but don't let down your guard because kids are still kids and when the pain and mark goes away he might try something similar/else. 2) Teach the puppy a soft bite and then no bite. I taught a soft bite first so that if they did end up with skin in their mouth they wouldn't bite down. Once they were able to not bite down I taught them that putting their mouths on skin or clothing was not acceptable.
[/B][/I][/U]I'm sorry, but I have to totally disagree with the "teaching" of a soft bite. What would possibly be the reason for this, instead of just teaching a "no bite"?
just an opinion , an 11 week old mastiff pup that would try to bite the vet for giving it a shot is not normal puppy behavior , it strikes me as an abnormally low threshold for the pup to be defending himself , and I would think an indication of the dogs future temperament .....
Bolding certain parts of my post does not hide the fact that I said continued training (including bite inhibition) AND... And yet you continue to try to "prove" that I feel that revoking furniture privledges is all that is required to correct what happened. Im not going to argue, I think your advice was great but in my opinion dogs should earn privledges and not just be given them. But regardless, I dont think anything I said has warranted a continued attack. But in your opinion it does, and I respectfully realize everyone is entitles to their opinion, even if it differs from my own.Its not a problem with a pup playing rough, its a problem with the child accidently hurt the dog and the dog responded in a very normal fashion. The pup's "place in the family" has nothing to do with that, and you're the one who REPEATED that the solution was the keep the dog off the furniture when thats not even the problem. Re-read your own post, here, I quoted it for you, so you don't even have to go find it.
If your solution of a pup's very normal reaction of pain is to tell him how low on the totem pole he lies then you're causing yourself more problems than you're "fixing".
just an opinion , an 11 week old mastiff pup that would try to bite the vet for giving it a shot is not normal puppy behavior , it strikes me as an abnormally low threshold for the pup to be defending himself , and I would think an indication of the dogs future temperament .....
just an opinion , an 11 week old mastiff pup that would try to bite the vet for giving it a shot is not normal puppy behavior , it strikes me as an abnormally low threshold for the pup to be defending himself , and I would think an indication of the dogs future temperament .....
It is a back up safety measure. When I first got Jiggers (first ever dog) a lot of my research stated that you wanted to make sure that they knew that if they ever got skin between their teeth that they couldn't bite down. The reasoning behind it was that even dogs that are taught not to bite can still bite if in pain/scared and multiple levels of training are harder to break than just a single layer. It may be a false sense of security but then again given they are thinking creatures all training can be considered that.
shots hurt. Getting upset and thinking that there is something fundamentally wrong with a puppy for reacting to something hurting him and dogs react with their mouths, would be like thinking a baby crying after getting his shots meant that the grown man would be emotionally unbalanced. Just my opinion.
Bolding certain parts of my post does not hide the fact that I said continued training (including bite inhibition) AND... And yet you continue to try to "prove" that I feel that revoking furniture privledges is all that is required to correct what happened. Im not going to argue, I think your advice was great but in my opinion dogs should earn privledges and not just be given them. But regardless, I dont think anything I said has warranted a continued attack. But in your opinion it does, and I respectfully realize everyone is entitles to their opinion, even if it differs from my own.
I've always personally found that a soft mouth comes from bite inhibition training, and that allowing a pup to bite at all is asking for trouble down the road by confusing the issue over whats allowed. Take Apollo for example, we worked from day one on a strict no-bite no-mouth on humans period process. Yesterday I was working on brushing out his tail, again, cause somehow it always matts up in a matter of hours when he's blowing his coat. I hit a matt with more force than I meant to, resulting in a hard yank on several hairs, and he came around and grabbed for the thing that made his tail hurt, got my hand, held on with no teeth for a second and heaved a sign and went back to patiently waiting while I worked on his tail.[/QUOTE
I agree with you Ruth. And, I had to smile at the "heaved a sigh" part...When Bella is displeased because things are not going her way/she's not getting her own way she uses all sorts of "sighs" to communicate her feelings!! It's almost like having an eye-rolling teenage in the house again