What's new
Mastiff Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Welcome back!

    We decided to spruce things up and fix some things under the hood. If you notice any issues, feel free to contact us as we're sure there are a few things here or there that we might have missed in our upgrade.

A breeder is a breeder is... well, maybe not.

Vicki

Administrator
From the Blog: For Your Entertainment
written by John Sibley
A breeder is a breeder is... well, maybe not.

I'm retiring this sticker from the FYE store, and it's been a long time coming. It's something I used to fervently believe and this sticker was prominently featured on my truck - the dog on it is my dog, Jessie. As with MSN, this is something that initially sounds good and smart and logical to the rescue-minded until you begin to dig deeper and you find out that it isn't necessarily so.

Look, I'm a rescue guy. Hard core. My dogs are all rescues and the idea of purchasing a dog from a breeder is, to me, unfathomable when there are so many that are dying. Then again, I have no real attachment to any particular breed or type (although I seem to always get the Spaniels!), I have no desire to raise a puppy (my dogs are difficult enough), and I could care less about bloodlines, shows, ribbons or papers.

Having worked in rescue for a number of years, first as a volunteer then as a professional, I can tell you that the old notion that adopting a shelter dog is just getting yourself "someone else's problem" is sheer hogwash - and I know that the old myth is dying off among the general public. Oddly, the publicity surrounding the foreclosure crisis helped greatly to accelerate the passing of this stereotype as stories came out in major news outlets of pets sent to shelters through no fault of their own.

That being said, there will always be people who will not consider rescue, and some of those reasons are perfectly legitimate. Some absolutely must have an 8 week old purebred Ring Tail Snodheimer and no other dog will do (no offense to the fans of the noble Ring Tail Snodheimer!), and purebred Ringies don't show up often in rescue and are quickly snapped up when they do. Some want a working dog from known stock. Some want a purebreed puppy from a known bloodline that has been carefully and thoroughly screened for genetic flaws. Some are getting a dog for the first time and want someone who will hold their hand at 3am after their new puppy turns the living room carpet into a poopy Jackson Pollock painting because he got into the garbage after dinner. Who am I to judge? I can and will talk people's ears off about the virtues of rescued dogs, but some people aren't going to listen, and they're going to get dogs elsewhere.

And where, exactly? We're not doing ourselves any favors by alienating good breeders. I'm talking about the ones who do extensive genetic screenings on dogs they breed, who raise them in their homes with love and care and attention, who follow their progress over their lifetimes and always take them back rather than ever letting them enter the shelter system. Many of these breeders also do rescue work (quietly, quietly!) for their chosen breed(s), applying their knowledge to help those animals who do end up in shelters. By vilifying breeders as a whole, we're driving away these people who love animals and dogs and want to help them as much as anyone.

We also face a common enemy in the form of the puppymillers and backyard breeders whom we would all like to see driven out of existence - but by lumping everyone who breeds dogs together, we're not only driving away potentially powerful allies, we're actually driving them to hold their noses and stand together with puppy milling scum with well meaning but over-zealous legislative efforts that target not only soulless puppy millers but caring, dedicated breeders as well.

I don't agree with good breeders on everything, I'm not a market for them, and I hope the customer service of shelters everywhere can improve to compete with theirs. However, I agree with them on a lot more than I disagree with them on, we all have a genuine love for dogs, and we all want to see puppy mills driven out of existence. If we're going to do it, we're going to need to stand together, and I for one will proudly stand beside them to do so.

http://foryourentertainment.blogspot.com/2010/06/breeder-is-breeder-is-well-maybe-not_06.html#links
 

Cody

Well-Known Member
Thank you for posting this.
For many years I worked in/with rescues fostering many dogs, I had some fantastic experiences doing so.
Although now I have a purebred dog, purchased from a responsible breeder, I agree that we have to work with the rescue system.
A good breeder should not breed more then they can take back IMO.
 

mia

Well-Known Member
I run No Puppy Mills Canada and have NOTHING against reputable responsible breeding. I am 100% rescue for ME but am happy to direct someone to a good breeder if that's what they want. We need good breeders to keep good lines alive, to keep improving dogs and studying genetics, eliminating health issues etc. I have friends who are breeders, great breeders and there is nothing wrong with it. Not everyone wants a rescue or can handle one, I tend to take the dogs that most can't deal with, while there are tons of easy rescues too well some folks want a pup. Again we need to educate the public on where to get a pup if that's really what they want, and not support irresponsible breeders, pet stores and puppy mills.

Same goes for rescue, there are good ones and not so ethical ones... been there done that.
 

dogman#1

Well-Known Member
Vicki,

Perfectly worded, no more can be added and could not agree more. I have 2 rescue dogs myself and would get more if I had more room, awesome lil guys and could not ask for anything better.